I've met Tom Baeyens and Joram Barrez in the last edition of Devoxx. Their talks were a "must attend" section in all recent Devoxx editions, and they will probably present their brand new product at this year's edition too. The framework is still in alpha but I think it will evolve a lot until there. By the way, the current version is more about playing and understanding the idea than effectively performing processes. What I've seen so far deserves some comments.
My first impression was nice. Activiti is very simple to install and the team made a very good work on the design of the user interfaces. Of course, I cannot be so critical right now because it is just beginning, but I will follow the project from now on to give constructive feedbacks to the team.
On the other hand, I was expecting something different, simpler, like a process engine 100% controlled by REST web services. I don't like the fact of a web application handling the processes execution (screenshot above). Using Activiti Explorer, you can start processes and perform their activities, but it forces the user to be aware of processes' details. I think an application that implements a business process should be more focused on:
- the performance of the user when executing his/her activities; and
- the quality of the data inserted.

In the next days I would want to have the time to try it.
ReplyDeleteOne question for you is: do you know if it allows to define the UIs for users interaction with business processes?
Thanks.
Antonio
At least in this alpha version it doesn't support the definition of UIs based on business processes. I'm not sure if it is part of their plans. I'm observing the evolution of the project.
ReplyDeleteLike many others I was looking for an easy "how to" about making Activiti work on Ubuntu, I couldn’t find it so I wrote my own. Check my website:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.winko-erades.nl/
Regards,
Winko